If Ajax was the most overused and ubiquitous web term of 2005, I would guess that Web 2.0 is the equivalent for 2006. There are Web 2.0 companies popping up everywhere with trendy graphics.
Sure, I love to share my photos in Flickr, add my latest bookmarks at Del.icio.us, check out the latest entries at Digg, watch funny videos at YouTube, discuss wine at Cork’d, browse photos at Zoomr, network at Linkedin, evaluate shopping options at Crowdstorm, say hello at Socializr, scrobble at last.fm and much much more at the thousands of sites with social interaction on the web. In addition to the big sites, there are a lot of clones out there. For instance, Del.icio.us has over 50 counterparts and growing.
You are also encouraged to tag the stuff you visit, using a plethora of social bookmarking tools. How many of these icons can you recognize?

Apart from all the hyped “2.0” sites, there are thousands of good old sites such as communities, forums, newsgroups, bulletin boards, guest books… Even though they are perhaps not as sexy as their modern counterparts, they are still alive and well.
Is the very number of current web applications overwhelming, or is it the impression of access to different systems? What will happen if (when) some of the large sites will merge user databases, creating the mother of all web apps where you can do anything with a single distributed login? Do you really want to give all that power to a single company? What will happen when all these systems are connected and people’s data can be cross-referenced? These are complex issues and will likely take some time to work out.
2 comments
Leave a reply